Are you an LLM? Read llms.txt for a summary of the docs, or llms-full.txt for the full context.
Skip to content

3. Velocity of Settlement: Why Liquidity Providers Should Care

We reframe “velocity of money” as velocity of settlement: how quickly outstanding promises move from owed to fulfilled.

For a given voucher type j across a network of CPs, define:

  1. D_j = total outstanding debt (unsettled vouchers) valued in a common index
  2. S_j​ = total value of settlements (redemptions routed through CPs) per period

Then the network settlement velocity of voucher j is:

V_j (network) = S_j/D_j

This is a flow/stock ratio: how many units of settlement flow pass through the network per unit of outstanding debt. We will expand this below to a federation of CPs.

Key insight: swaps do not change total value in a pool or the network; only settlement (redemption) reduces debt of the voucher issuer. Liquidity that increases routing capacity increases settlement velocity, which drives economically grounded fee volume.

Plain language: If vouchers get redeemed quickly, more real trade flows through the network. More flow → more fee events → more sustainable fee pooling.

What This Is / Isn’t

  • Not an AMM for speculative pairs. CPP values and limits are policyful and capacity-aware.
  • Not a bank deposit scheme. Vouchers are redeemable claims with explicit SLAs and fallback guarantors.
  • Not uncollateralized credit expansion. Limits and inventory checks bound issuance and routing.
  • Is a clearing network for redeemable commitments with auditable receipts and recourse.
  • Is a producer-credit & clearing rail: vouchers can function as exchangeable collateral, enabling working capital that can be repaid through in-kind fulfillment as vouchers are purchased and redeemed.